FINANCIAL FRAUDSTER NEWS EXCLUSIVE: Raman Bhatia's Starling Bank Defies Law, Faces Judicial Scrutiny Over Unlawful Fund Freeze – Senior HMRC Solicitor John Wray Implicated in 'Gross Negligence' Scandal
LONDON, UK – 26 June 2025 – Financial Fraudster News Investigations, through privileged access to unfolding court documents, can today deliver a damning exposé: Starling Bank, under the leadership of its Group Chief Executive Officer, Raman Bhatia, stands accused of wilfully flouting the law and systematically withholding legitimate client funds. This shocking breach of legal obligations is inextricably linked to a profound scandal involving Senior HMRC solicitor and team manager, John Wray, and alleged corrupt HMRC Officer Lucy Craig, who are at the very heart of a "gross negligence" and "fraud on Suffolk Magistrates' Court" probe.
This explosive revelation upends an 18-month, taxpayer-funded HMRC investigation, now definitively exposed as being based on gross negligence and deliberate falsehoods perpetuated by Mr. Wray and Ms. Craig, who stand accused of "doubling down with their lies." Their actions have plunged Starling Bank Ltd into a crisis, with the challenger bank now facing accusations of working "hand in glove" with HMRC in a "cooperation overkill" to unlawfully withhold Ms. Kinder's legitimate funds.
The Fraud on the Court and the Whitewash Attempt
At the core of this unfolding scandal is the £600,827.92 belonging to Angelica Kinder (name withheld for legal purposes), which has been frozen since 9 February 2024 under a highly contentious Account Freezing Order (AFO). HMRC Officer Lucy Craig obtained this AFO by allegedly falsely stating to Suffolk Magistrates' Court that Ms. Kinder was money laundering. Crucially, as detailed in Ms. Kinder's witness statements and robust legal correspondence seen by FFN, Ms. Craig and now, by extension, Senior Solicitor John Wray, failed to disclose critical due diligence that would have immediately proven the lawful origin of these funds.
The money, Ms. Kinder has repeatedly confirmed, derived from a legitimate VAT return of £993,749.00 obtained by Nathan Paralegals and Company LLP (NPC). This VAT refund was not only lawful but had been subjected to a "rigorous and thorough compliance check" by HMRC Officer Veronica Benjamin in October 2021, with senior HMRC approval. The alleged deliberate non-disclosure of HMRC's own prior verification by Ms. Craig and Mr. Wray to the Magistrates' Court constitutes a profound "fraud on the court."
NPC, the source of these funds, is a legitimate international litigation funder with its principal office in the Cayman Islands. Its board, in September 2021, formally permitted all UK funds, including this VAT refund, to be used for litigation funding or investment. Furthermore, the ultimate parent of NPC's successor entity (Distressed Debt Xchange Group LLP) is part of a larger private company which recently saw a seven percent stake acquired for over £1.4 billion, underscoring the absolute legitimacy and scale of its operations.
Starling Bank: Caught Disobeying the Law and Losing Trust?
Starling Bank, the institution that initially contacted HMRC regarding Ms. Kinder's funds, is now facing intense scrutiny. Despite the AFO having definitively expired on 5 June 2025, Starling Bank has stubbornly refused to release Ms. Kinder's funds. The bank admitted that it sought "legal advice" from Lucy Craig and John Wray – the very HMRC officials implicated in the alleged fraudulent AFO investigation. This admission points to a disturbing level of collusion.
Angelica Kinder [not her real name] has repeatedly communicated with Starling Bank, directly challenging its unlawful stance. In a letter dated 5th June 2025, Ms. Kinder asserted: "It is a fundamental principle of financial regulation and legal obligation that upon the expiration of an Account Freezing Order, a banking institution is unequivocally obligated to allow the account holder immediate and unfettered access to their funds, unless a new, valid, and distinct order has been issued by the court. No such further order exists in this instance. Starling Bank is therefore under a clear and immediate obligation to comply with the expiration of the AFO and release my funds without further delay."
Starling Bank's replies, seen by FFN, have relied on Ms. Craig's assertion of a forfeiture application and a misguided interpretation of Section 303Z14(6) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Ms. Kinder vehemently rebutted this, stating: "This provision applies only to an AFO that is active and unexpired at the time the forfeiture application is lodged. It does not retrospectively revive an AFO that has already expired, nor does it create a new legal basis for freezing funds where the original order has lapsed."
Ms. Kinder's repeated and verifiable inquiries with the relevant court have confirmed no Account Forfeiture Notice has been lawfully lodged, nor is any court date for such proceedings in the court's diary. This stark discrepancy directly contradicts the information apparently conveyed to Starling Bank by HMRC, exposing a baseless justification for the continued freeze. Starling Bank is thus "all but in name acting as an organ of a state entity that is desperately trying to cover [up] one of the most reckless investigations carried out by two HMRC employees."
Judicial Hammer Falls: Mr. Justice Calver Demands Answers – Deadline Looms
The judicial hammer has now fallen squarely on Starling Bank. Ms. Kinder, in her relentless pursuit of justice, filed an urgent Injunction Application to compel the release of her legitimate funds. High Court Judge Mr. Justice Calver has now reviewed the application and issued a critical directive on 25 June 2025:
(1) The Defendant [Starling Bank] must be served with this application and the grounds for injunctive relief.
(2) The Account Freezing Order itself and any relevant correspondence from the defendant [Starling Bank] relating to that Order must be lodged by the Claimant [Starling Bank, in the context of the AFO application] on CE File or otherwise be provided to the court forthwith.
(3) The defendant bank must state as a matter of urgency and in any event no later than 1pm on Monday 30 June 2025 whether it opposes this application or not and if it does why it does.
This order from Mr. Justice Calver is a direct and unequivocal demand for Starling Bank to produce evidence of a valid AFO that it relies on to withhold Ms. Kinder's money. It underscores the court's grave concern regarding the bank's current position and its patent failure to provide lawful justification. Ms. Kinder's recent witness statement confirms her full compliance with the court's directive, despite Starling Bank's continued non-cooperation.
The deadline is now set: Starling Bank has until 1pm on Monday, 30 June 2025, to comply with Mr. Justice Calver's order. Failure to do so will likely result in severe consequences, including potential further adverse orders and intensified legal action for the unlawful withholding of funds.
This expose highlights a profound crisis of trust and accountability at Starling Bank, whose CEO, Raman Bhatia, now leads an organization accused of deliberately flouting the law and colluding in a desperate attempt to cover up alleged misconduct by state officials. The bank's actions have caused immeasurable pain and significant financial loss to Ms. Kinder. Financial Fraudster News will continue its tenacious reporting on this case, exposing every layer of alleged corruption and ensuring accountability for those who seek to undermine the integrity of the UK's financial and legal systems.
For further inquiries, contact:
Financial Fraudster News Court Reporting Team
@therealfinancialfraudsternews or @the_real_FFN
Related Article:
 Directions_to_Starling_Bank_Limited_issued_under_the_Retail_Banking_Market_Investigation_Order.pdf | [Directions to Starling Bank Limited ] | 225 kB |
