FINANCIAL FRAUDSTER NEWS INVESTIGATIONS EXCLUSIVE: FFN INVESTIGATION BOMBSHELL – PARFITT "WILFULLY" BURIED 2021 HEARING; "STATE OF LIBYA" ITSELF CONFIRMED PCP'S AUTHORITY & "CLAUSE 26"
By David H., Barrister-Correspondent & FFN Contributor
LONDON, UK – This investigation has moved from a case of gross judicial negligence to one of wilful, complicit fraud.
Financial Fraudster News can now reveal the most damning omission by His Honour Judge Nicholas Parfitt: his "bogus decision" to strike out the K0QZ48AX claim was made by deliberately ignoring a 2021 court hearing where the State of Libya itself confirmed the very facts he dismissed as having "no credibility".
This was the "catastrophic omission" that allowed the 12 November "sham hearing" to succeed. HHJ Parfitt knew his entire judgment was based on a lie. He knew the evidence he was shown by Freshfields was false. He proceeded anyway, "knowingly and complicitly", to exclude the American and Libyan parties who would have exposed him.
The HMCTS investigation is no longer about a "missing file"; it is about a cover-up.
1. The "Buried" 2021 Hearing: The State of Libya's Confirmation
HHJ Parfitt’s entire ruling hinged on one "secret" piece of evidence: a letter... dated 12 November 2025 (the SPB letter) which he used to find that the State of Libya ("SOL") had "no involvement" and that the 2010 Power of Attorney (POA) had "no credibility" .
This investigation can now reveal this finding is a judicial fraud.
FFN has been shown evidence of a 2021 County Court hearing where:
"The State of Libya"—the same party SPB claimed to represent—was a party to the proceedings.
At that hearing, SOL formally confirmed to the court that Paine Crow and Partners (PCP) was its "long POA sanctioned agent."
Critically, SOL "reiterated Clause 26" of that 2010 POA.
2. The "Clause 26" Bombshell: The "Gaddafi" Smear is a Lie
HHJ Parfitt's judgment (Para 15) mockingly dismisses the 2010 POA as an "idea with no credibility" because it was signed by Col. Gaddafi... some 15 years later.
This was a wilful deception. He knew about the 2021 hearing where the current State of Libya addressed this. They "reiterated Clause 26", which is the "Continuity of State" clause found on page 148 of the POA:
"26. CONTINUITY OF STATE... This Power of Attorney is granted by the Client, The State of Libya, as a continuing legal and sovereign entity. The power and authority... shall not be affected... by any change in the specific administration, cabinet, or recognized government of the Client... PROVIDED the Client continues to exist as a sovereign state."
This clause—re-confirmed by the modern State of Libya in 2021—proves the POA was designed to survive the regime change.
HHJ Parfitt knew his "Gaddafi" smear was a lie. He knew the POA was valid. He knew SPB's "secret letter" was contradicted by a formal court confirmation. He ignored it all.
3. The Ramifications: A Sham Hearing Built on Lies
This omission is the "primary reason to exclude the Claimant and Defendant". HHJ Parfitt had to conduct the "sham hearing" in their absence. Had they been present, they would have simply produced the 2021 hearing transcript and his entire "bogus decision" would have evaporated.
This omission proves:
The "Procedural Ambush" Was Deliberate: The 48-hour notice was not a mistake. It was a calculated tactic by Freshfields and the Court to ensure the victims and their "damning" 2021 evidence could not appear.
The "Missing File" Was a Pretext: The file, missing since September, also contained the 2016 DDJ Emerson Order (Tab 10), which also confirmed the POA had no evidence... of any revocation . The judge now had two prior court orders to ignore.
The "Prisoner" Lie Was a Distraction: The judge's focus on the LGC "prisoner" alibi —which he knew was false because the Claim Form (Tab 19) was signed by a US lawyer —was a "smokescreen" to divert attention from his wilful suppression of the 2021 hearing.
Is this the UK or Russia? When a judge can wilfully ignore binding evidence, collude in an ambush, and use "secret evidence" to justify a theft, the line is blurred. This is the "complicit act" the USA is "taking an interest" in.
4. Impact on the Appeal
HHJ Parfitt's "catastrophic omission" is devastating, but it makes the appeal a certainty.
The case is no longer just about a procedural error. It is about wilful judicial misconduct and fraud on the court.
The appeal will be based on the fact that HHJ Parfitt knew his findings were false. The 2021 hearing and the 2016 Emerson Order prove he knew PCP's authority was valid. His 12 November ruling is, therefore, a perverse judgment made in bad faith.
This is "one of the worst days in British legal history", and the appeal will now seek to expose the corruption at its core.
For further inquiries, contact:
Financial Fraudster News Investigations
Now on X: @FraudsterNews, @therealfinancialfraudsternews or @the_real_FFN
Related Article:
