FINANCIAL FRAUDSTER NEWS INVESTIGATIONS EXCLUSIVE: UK High Court Judges Accused Of Endorsing £10m Libyan Fraud; Top Law Firm RPC Implicated in 'breach of Warranty of Authority' Cover-up
London, UK – In a bombshell development sending shockwaves through the British legal establishment, Financial Fraudster News Investigations can today reveal disturbing allegations of how senior UK High Court judges allegedly allowed and endorsed a £10 million fraud orchestrated by the State of Libya, aided by leading law firm RPC.
Damning admissions from court officials, following FFN's relentless reporting, confirm that RPC was permitted to file critical court documents despite being in a clear breach of warranty of authority – a dereliction of judicial oversight that effectively green-lit a massive financial deception.
The scandal escalates previous concerns about judicial "negligence" to a shocking new level, exposing how evidence against the alleged fraud was left unchallenged because the true opposing party was never properly served. FFN's investigation points to a brazen manipulation of the justice system, with key figures now facing intense scrutiny.
The Hampstead Mansion Deception: A Tale of Two Truths
At the core of the £10 million fraud lies a lavish Hampstead mansion, purportedly acquired with diverted funds from the Libyan public purse during the Gaddafi regime. However, FFN Investigations has uncovered startling contradictions at the heart of this narrative.
We have seen two sets of statements from Mohammed Shaban [seen above] of MS Legal Solicitors (a self-described "one-man operation") and Gregory Mitchell QC, both dated the same day, yet presenting two fundamentally contradictory versions of events concerning the property's funding. Both statements were signed with a statement of truth, raising immediate red flags about their veracity.
Crucially, internal evidence from Libyan officials – evidence conspicuously not seen by the High Court – unequivocally shows that no funds from Libya were ever used to purchase the Hampstead property. Instead, the mansion was acquired through legitimate investors who channelled funds via a special purpose vehicle (SPV) based in the British Virgin Islands. The true purpose: to facilitate easier access for investors and business partners to high-level Gaddafi officials and even Gaddafi himself for the approval of legitimate business contracts.
Judges "Sleeping at the Wheel of Justice"
The most damning revelation is the alleged complicity of senior judges. FFN Investigations can reveal that Justice Sir Robin Knowles, Lord Justice Popplewell, Chief Master Marsh, and Lord Justice Flaux (in no particular order), allegedly allowed RPC to file crucial documents and, astonishingly, approve a draft order without ever questioning RPC's fundamental right to act. This astonishing judicial oversight resulted directly in the consummation of the £10 million fraud.
A "breach of warranty of authority" occurs when a solicitor incorrectly represents that they have the authority to act on behalf of a client, inducing a third party (in this case, the Court itself) to act in a manner they would not have otherwise. FFN has now obtained confirmation from an unnamed High Court official that RPC was, in fact, not on record as acting for the State of Libya in proceedings against Capitana Seas Ltd (BVI) in 2012.
"How has three top judges and the High Court Chief Master allowed RPC to file submissions, documents when they are not on record and are in breach of warranty of authority?" questions a frustrated legal observer, reflecting widespread disbelief.
Unfolding Cover-Up and Judicial Scrutiny
Following FFN's press release to the offices of the Lord Chief Justice, HM Courts and Tribunal Service, and the Ministry of Justice, court officials have now been forced to admit that RPC indeed filed court documents that were subsequently acted upon by the aforementioned judges.
Court filings now confirm that Mohammed Shaban and the State of Libya are subject to new court proceedings, including a crucial disclosure application. This application seeks supporting evidence for the very facts that the "cabal of judges" inexplicably failed to demand: evidence of a financial link between Libyan state funds and the Hampstead property. This new legal action is further bolstered by a statement from Rafik Nayed, former CEO of the Libyan Investment Authority, who unequivocally asserts that no link to Libyan State funds exists.
In a highly unusual move, FFN Investigations can reveal from court filings at Bristol County Court that Shaban has now written to the High Court, specifically requesting Chief Master Marsh – who has previously faced criticism for failing to uphold impartiality in Shaban's favour – to oversee this disclosure application. This is a matter normally handled by a lower court, raising immediate and grave questions about why such an intervention is sought.
Creditor Outrage and Demand for Justice
The patience of affected debt holders is wearing thin. A debt holder of Capitana Seas Ltd (BVI) stated, "We debt holders have been patient to date and our patience has been wearing thin. We have asked management [Capitana Seas Ltd] to get their act together. It’s clear that a cabal of judges have acted shamefully and negligently and have allowed a massive fraud under their noses to ensue, and we will continue to raise issues about the cover-up and of those that have aided and abetted the cover-up who were involved. I am shocked that Chief Master Marsh may be involved again."
A Cayman Islands debt holder expressed profound anger: "I have major concerns over British justice and their conservative handling of breaches of warranty of authority. We hear about an old boys’ network in the UK, but when I look at how RPC is getting away with this breach of warranty of authority without sanction to date, I am angry. I am told by the directors [Capitana Seas Ltd] that new evidence exists that clearly shows they [RPC] knew a fraud was in progress and were just simply greedy for fees. I hope they get punished."
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), contacted by FFN Investigations, stated: "We have received no complaint regarding the alleged conduct of RPC, but we would be astonished in such a high profile case that RPC could or would submit documents, but if true, it appears that several judges were possibly negligent in allowing solicitors not on record to act for a party in which an order at least was drawn on an unlawful submission." The SRA's statement, while denying a formal complaint, serves as an implicit indictment of the alleged judicial failings.
This shocking exposé highlights a blatant manipulation of the UK legal system, where an alleged multi-million-pound fraud has been allowed to flourish under the very noses of the High Court, with crucial questions surrounding the conduct of lawyers and judges.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations has contacted RPC, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice, and the Ministry of Justice for comment. All have declined to respond.
FFN will be reporting on all future developments and any legal action that may ensue.
Related Article:
 RPC_High Court 9 March 2012 | [RPC not on record confirmation] | 111 kB |
| HM Land Registry Title Register.pdf | [HM Land Registry Fraud Fraud] | 137 kB |
